INTRODUCING THE BUSINESS IMPLEMENTATION INSTITUTION: A CROSS-REGIME ANALYSIS OF INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIES VIA AGENT-BASED SIMULATION
Abstract
This study introduces the concept of the Business Implementation Institution (BII) as a missing analytical layer in institutional and strategic management theory. The BII is defined as an integrative system combining formal rules, informal norms, organizational structures, and interaction mechanisms that enable the realization of economic activity. To validate the analytical relevance of this concept, the study employs an agent-based modelling approach based on an extended Axelrod tournament. The study contributes to institutional economics by introducing a functional-integrative concept of implementation and by demonstrating its applicability through simulation-based analysis of complex institutional environments.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2023). Power and progress: Our thousand-year struggle over technology and prosperity. PublicAffairs.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39 no. 8, pp. 2255–2276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Mankins, M., & Steele, R. (2005). Turning great strategy into great performance. Harvard Business Review, no. 83, pp. 65–72.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 39 no. 5, pp. 920–936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, Vol. 51 no. 1, pp. 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.
Zelenko, H. I. (Ed.). (2025). Instytutsiina (ne)sproMozhnist derzhavy v Ukraini: yak rozirvaty zamknene kolo. [Institutional (in)Capacity of the state in Ukraine: How to break the vicious circle.] I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the NAS of Ukraine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53317/978-617-14-0363-5 (in Ukrainian)
Acemoglu D., Johnson S. Power and progress: our thousand-year struggle over technology and prosperity. New York: PublicAffairs, 2023.
Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal. 2018. Vol. 39, No. 8. pp. 2255–2276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Mankins M., Steele R. Turning great strategy into great performance. Harvard Business Review. 2005. Vol. 83. pp. 65–72.
North D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Peng M. W., Wang D. Y. L., Jiang Y. An institution-based view of international business strategy. Journal of International Business Studies. 2008. Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 920–936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377
Srnicek N. Platform capitalism. Cambridge : Polity Press, 2017.
Teece D. J. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning. 2018. Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Williamson O. E. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.
Зеленько, Г. І. (ред.) Інституційна (не)спроможність держави в Україні: як розірвати замкнене коло. Київ: ІПіЕНД ім. І. Ф. Кураса НАН України. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53317/978-617-14-0363-5
Copyright (c) 2026 Ігор Гурняк

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

