RISK MANAGEMENT IN CULTURAL PROJECTS

Keywords: risk management, cultural projects, project management, social development, risks, managerial decision-making

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the specific features of risk management in cultural projects as an integral component of contemporary management practices. The relevance of the study is determined by the growing number of cultural initiatives implemented in project form, the increasing uncertainty of their operational environments, and the high dependence of project performance on social and human resource factors. In conditions characterized by unstable funding, intensified stakeholder expectations, reputational sensitivity, and the expanding role of the human factor, risk management becomes a critical mechanism for ensuring the sustainability and resilience of cultural initiatives. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the feasibility and necessity of applying adapted risk management approaches in cultural projects, taking into account their social and organizational specificity. The research methodology is based on the analysis of academic sources, systematization of theoretical approaches to risk management, and generalization of project management practices. The study advances a classification of risks in cultural projects structured according to managerial zones of influence rather than solely by formal sources of threats. In addition, an adapted risk management model is proposed, grounded in a cyclical process that includes risk identification, analysis, managerial response, and continuous monitoring throughout the project lifecycle. Particular attention is devoted to the role of personnel and the management team as key actors in the risk management process. The article argues that in cultural projects, risk is not limited to financial or technical dimensions but is largely shaped by social interactions, communication patterns, organizational culture, and the stability of human resources. It is demonstrated that integrating risk management into the broader system of social development management of personnel contributes to reducing project vulnerability, strengthening organizational adaptability, and enhancing the overall effectiveness of managerial decision-making. The practical significance of the research lies in the possibility of applying the proposed conceptual and analytical framework by managers of cultural organizations to increase the resilience, stability, and long-term sustainability of project-based cultural activities in environments marked by structural uncertainty and resource constraints.

References

Колпаченко Н.М., Майборода М.М., Полякова О.М. Комплексний підхід до управління ризиками в проєктному менеджменті: від ідентифікації до реагування. Економіка та суспільство. 2024. Вип. 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-115

Комар В.О. Особливості управління мистецькими проєктами в системі культурно-креативних індустрій України. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2021. № 3. С. 53–60.

Комарніцька О.В. Сутність і різновиди проєктів у сфері культури. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2024. № 1. С. 137–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2024.302048

Ahmeti R., Vladi S. Risk management in public sector: A literature review. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 2017. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 323–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v2i1.p323-329

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance. 2017.

Flyvbjerg B. What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. PM World Journal. 2014. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 1–10.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 20121:2024 Event sustainability management systems — Requirements with guidance for use. 2024.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines. 2018.

Koppenjan J., Klijn E.-H. Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London : Routledge, 2004.

Lőrincz K., Ráthonyi G., Müller A. Towards a more resilient festival industry: An analysis of the adoption of risk management models for sustainability. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15. No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031921

Meyer A.D., Gaba V., Colwell K.A. Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organization Science. 2005. Vol. 16. No. 5. P. 456–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0135

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Risk management and corporate governance. Paris : OECD Publishing, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208636-en

Osborne S.P. The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London : Routledge, 2010.

Project Management Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 7th ed. Newtown Square : Project Management Institute, 2021.

Kolpachenko, N. M., Maiboroda, M. M., & Polyakova, O. M. (2024). Kompleksnyi pidkhid do upravlinnia ryzykamy v proiektnomu menedzhmenti: vid identyfikatsii do reahuvannia [A comprehensive approach to risk management in project management: from identification to response]. Economy and Society, no. 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-115 (in Ukrainian)

Komar, V. O. (2021). Osoblyvosti upravlinnia mystetskymy proiektamy v systemi kulturno-kreatyvnykh industrii Ukrainy [Features of art projects management in the system of cultural and creative industries of Ukraine]. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, no. 3, pp. 53–60. (in Ukrainian)

Komarnitska, O. V. (2024). Sutnist i riznovydy proiektiv u sferi kultury [Essence and varieties of projects in the sphere of culture]. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, no. 1, pp. 137–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2024.302048 (in Ukrainian)

Ahmeti, R., & Vladi, S. (2017). Risk management in public sector: A literature review. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 323–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v2i1.p323-329

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2017). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. PM World Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–10.

International Organization for Standardization. (2024). ISO 20121:2024 Event sustainability management systems — Requirements with guidance for use.

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines.

Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.

Lőrincz, K., Ráthonyi, G., & Müller, A. (2023). Towards a more resilient festival industry: An analysis of the adoption of risk management models for sustainability. Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031921

Meyer, A. D., Gaba, V., & Colwell, K. A. (2005). Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organization Science, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 456–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0135

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). Risk management and corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208636-en

Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London: Routledge.

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.

Article views: 16
PDF Downloads: 6
Published
2026-03-30
How to Cite
Shostakovska, A., & Lytvynov, Y. (2026). RISK MANAGEMENT IN CULTURAL PROJECTS. Sustainable Development of Economy, (1 (58), 1015-1020. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2026-58-135