FOREIGN PRACTICE OF MATERIAL AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY PRODUCER
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of the article is an analysis of foreign practice of state support of agriculture, allocation and evaluation of effective methods of state influence; determine problem areas of modern agricultural support in Ukraine and the possibility of their removal on the basis of the analyzed methods. Methodology of research. The following research methods were used during the study: economic and statistical, monographic, systematization – in determining the disparity in funding various sectors of agriculture in Ukraine and in the substantiation of necessity for state support of agriculture; dialectical method, generalization, tabular analysis – in determining the effectiveness of preferential taxation and in communicating the importance of secondary market of equipment for the reproduction process. Findings. The necessity of state support of agriculture has been substantiated; disparity in funding various sectors of agriculture Ukraine has been determined; the methods of state support on the example of France, Germany and the United States have been studied; forms of state support according to the WTO classification were reviewed and grouped; the efficiency of preferential taxation as an indirect method of state support was analyzed; importance of secondary market of equipment for the reproduction process has been proved. Originality. Proposals for using indirect methods of state regulation to support agricultural producers were contributed in order to create a favorable economic environment. It was proposed to use foreign experience of state regulation of the secondary market of equipment to implement partial reproduction in terms of limited opportunities. Practical value. The results obtained in the study will contribute to the development of innovative and investment ensuring of agricultural production. These results can be used in agriculture.
References
Молдаван Л.В. Форми господарювання в аграрному секторі країни в умовах глобалізації / Л.В. Молдаван // Економіка АПК. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 13−15.
Кейнс Дж.М. Общая теория занятости, процента и денег: избранные произведения / Дж.М. Кейнс. − М. : Экономика, 1993. – 543 c.
Butault J.-P. Les soutiens a L’Agriculture: Theorie, historie, mesure. / J.-P. Butault. – Paris: INRA, 2014. – 303 p.
Зимина Л.Б. Сельское хозяйство: в чем секрет успеха [Електронний ресурс] / Л.Б. Зимина // Бюджет. – 2012. – Режим доступу: http://bujet.ru/article/177647.php.
Кучин С.А. Мировой опыт финансовой поддержки аграрного сектора экономики и возможность его адаптации в России / C.А. Кучин // Финансы и кредит. – 2012. – №8 (44).– С. 22-28.
Правила внутренней поддержки сельского хозяйства в рамках СОТ [Електронний ресурс]. – 2011. – Режим доступу: http://www.chelagro.ru/more/tues/wto_rules.php.
Gruszczynski L. Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law: A Critical Analysis of the SPS Agreement / L. Gruszczynski. – Oxford: OUP, 2010.
Mohamed Behnassi, Shabbir A. Sharid, Nazia Mint’z-Habid Science, Policy and Polities of Modern Agricultural System. – Spinger Science+Business Media Doudrecht, 2014. – 356 p.
Dr. J. Wesley Burnett. Moving to A Free Market Agriculture Policy. – Americans for Limited Government Foundation, 2015. – 21 p.
Козенко К.Ю. Перспективные направления формирования лизинга восстановленной техники / К.Ю. Козенко // Фундаментальные исследования.– 2013. – №11. –С. 35-39.
Moldavan, L.V. (2010), “Forms of economy in agrarian sector of Ukraine under globalization”, Ekonomika APK, no.1, pp. 13−15.
Keynes, J.M. (1993), Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg: izbrannyye proizvedeniya [The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money: Collected Works], Эkonomyka, Moscow, Russia, 543 p.
Butault, J.-P. (2014), Les soutiens a L’Agriculture: Theorie, historie, mesure, INRA, Paris, France, 303 p.
Zimina, L.B. (2012), “Agriculture: what is the secret of success”, Byudzhet, available at: http://bujet.ru/article/177647.php. (access date May 26, 2016).
Kuchin, S.A. (2012), “World experience in financial support to the agricultural sector and the possibility of its adaptation in Russia”, Finansy i kredit, no. 8 (44), pp. 22-28.
“Rules of internal support of agriculture in the framework of the WTO” (2011), http://chelagro.ru/more/tues/wto_rules.php. (access date May 26, 2016).
Gruszczynski, L (2010), Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law: A Critical Analysis of the SPS Agreement, OUP, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Behnassi, Mohamed, Shahid, Shabbir A. and Mintz-Habib, Nazia (2014), Science, Policy and Politics of Modern Agricultural System. Spinger Science+Business Media Doudrecht, 356 p.
Dr. Burnett, J. Wesley (2015), Moving to A Free Market Agriculture Policy, Americans for Limited Government Foundation, 21 p.
Kozenko, K.Yu. (2013), “The perspective directions of leasing formation of the restored equipment”, Fundamentalnyye issledovaniya, no. 11, pp. 35-39.
