MODERN HUMAN CAPITAL THEORIES AND MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF ENERGY TRANSITION: A METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING «GREEN» COMPETENCIES
Abstract
The article presents a comprehensive study of the evolution of human capital theories within the context of contemporary global challenges, namely decarbonization and digital transformation. It is argued that traditional approaches, which view human potential as a static set of knowledge aimed at ensuring economic growth, have exhausted their relevance. Instead, the transition to a new eco-social paradigm is substantiated, wherein human capital acts as an active driver of the energy transition rather than merely a passive factor of production. The relevance of the study is driven by the necessity of establishing an intellectual foundation for the implementation of the "Twin Transition" paradigm. It is established that within the conditions of a BANI world, critical competencies include not only technical expertise in renewable energy but also digital literacy, systems thinking, and ethical responsibility. A comprehensive multidimensional model for assessing "green" human capital has been developed and proposed, based on the integration of three indicator blocks: cognitive-educational, performance-ecological, and value-ethical. Furthermore, an expanded competency matrix has been formulated, differentiating between Hard and Soft Skills through the lens of their impact on energy transformation and the circular economy. The study suggests utilizing Big Data and Social Media Analytics technologies to monitor the dynamics of new professional roles within the labor market. The research confirms that the development of "green" human capital is a strategic guarantee of national security and Ukraine's integration into the European economic area. For Ukraine, this holds particular significance in the context of post-war recovery under the "Build Back Better" principle, which requires the implementation of a life-long learning model to ensure energy decentralization and innovative development.
References
Amosha O. I., Cherevatsky D. Yu., & Tyutyunkin O. V. (2018). Smart specialization: From terminological convergence to industrial policy. Economics of Industry, no. 4(84), pp. 5–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2018.04.005
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. 412 p (Original issued 1964).
Boyko, A., Myrhorod, V., Stoyanets, N. & Reznik, O. (2025). Managing energy infrastructure under the imperatives of sustainable development: a strategic and innovation-oriented perspective from Ukraine. marketing and management of innovations, no. 16(4), pp. 16–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2025.4-02
Danylenko, A., & Satyr, L. (2019). Formation of human capital in the context of ensuring the sustainable development of rural areas. Agricultural and Resource Economics, no. 5(4), pp. 86–101.
Kirichok О., Orlovska Y, Zhanseitova G., at al. (2025). Bridging digital innovation and energy justice: The role of artificial intelligence in advancing energy equity. Environmental Economics, no. 16(4), pp. 166-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(4).2025.11
Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, no. 22(1), pp. 3–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Libanova, E. (2019). Preconditions and challenges for the development of human potential in Ukraine. Demography and Social Economy, no. 1(35), pp. 11–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2019.01.011
Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., Dehtyarova, I., Matsenko, O., & Rozhko, O. (2020). The effect of industrial revolutions on the transformation of social and economic systems. Problems and Perspectives in Management, no. 18(4), pp. 381–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.31
Novikova, O., Pankova, O., Chaliuk, Y., & Kasperovich, O. (2021) The Potential of Digitalisation and Social Dialogue in Ensuring Post-Pandemic Labour Market Sustainability: Priorities for Ukraine. Studies of Transition States and Societies. No. 13 (2). Pp. 70–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58036/stss.v13i2.954
Popp, D. (2012). Innovation and climate policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, no. 4, pp. 311–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110811-114519
Vona, F., Marin, G., Consoli, D., & Popp, D. (2018). Environmental regulation and green skills: An empirical exploration. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, no. 5(4), pp. 713–753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/698859
Vysochyna, A., Stoyanets, N., Mentel, G., & Olejarz, T. (2020). Environmental Determinants of a Country’s Food Security in Short-Term and Long-Term Perspectives. Sustainability, no. 12(10), 4090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104090
Stern N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, no. 51(1), pp. 1–17.
Copyright (c) 2026 Наталія Стоянець, Інна Сохань, Альвіна Орєхова, Тетяна Харченко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
