ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS A FACTOR OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ECONOMY OF THE STATE
Abstract
The article is devoted to an extremely important organizational form of business, namely entrepreneurship, that is, the sphere of application of human efforts in market conditions to organize the production of goods, works and services for satisfaction of human needs. Today, the democratization of the economic system creates equal opportunities for various forms of management and entrepreneurial activity. Modern trends in economic development, as well as foreign experience, convincingly prove that today without inventive, initiative, business people and without the development of various forms of entrepreneurial activity, further development has little prospect. The relevance of the topic of the article is determined by the fact that the problem of sustainable economic development in the state and in the modern world is becoming increasingly relevant, and a key component of this process is entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship today determines the competitiveness of the economy, social progress and balanced development. Today, in the period of a market economy, entrepreneurship is one of the important key segments of the market, because it is entrepreneurial. The article is devoted to an extremely important role, namely the sphere of organization of production of goods and services and formation of income for the needs of society. Today, the organization of production management is a function of activity is an effective driving force that generates the national wealth of the state through job creation and an increase in gross domestic product. The issue of entrepreneurship as an independent, initiative-based activity associated with the risk of its activities is quite important today, because it is an unlimited scope of application of efforts. After all, entrepreneurship is one of the varieties creative, exploratory and extremely important social activity, and in most countries of the world with a market economy, such activity is considered one of the most prestigious. As the practical reality of today shows, this type of activity is are quite significant and relevant, therefore they require detailed analysis and relevant research. Considering the undeniable multifaceted nature of this problem, as scientific community that economic growth and population well-being are possible primarily due to the manifestation of such a desire by society itself, namely its economic initiative and organization of specific activities. Quite important is the fact that the object of entrepreneurship is its specific type of activity in the spheres of the economy, namely production, commercial and financial, that is, this is specific production, trade, innovative business, intermediary services.
References
Алмашій Я.І. Антикризове фінансове управління підприємством: сутність та механізми реалізації. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету Серія : Економіка і менеджмент. 2015. Вип. 12. С. 66-69.
.Бойчик І.М., Харів П.С., Хопчпн М.І., Піча Ю.В. Економіка підприємства. Київ : "Каравела"; Львів: "Новий світ - 2000", 2001. 298с. С. 140.
Бондар Н.М., Макаровська Т.П. Економіка підприємства. підручник. Київ : МАУП, 2003. 268 с. С.117.
Головатий М.Ф. Управлінські аспекти соціальної роботи. Київ: 2004. 365 с.
Горбач Л.М., Котляров В.О. Економіка підприємства. Київ: «Кондор – 2021», 597 с. С. 40–74.
Горбач Л.М., Каун О.Б. Ринок фінансових послуг. Навчальний посібник. Київ: «Кондор – 2006» 435 с. С. 30–39.
Гавкалова Н.Л. Управління ефективністю менеджменту персоналу: монографія. Харків : ХНЕУ, 2011. 295 с. С. 107–120.
Дієсперов В.С. Економіка сільськогосподарської праці. Київ: ІАЕ УААН, 2004. 488 с. 9.Дорошенко Л.С. Управління трудовими ресурсами: навчальний посібник Київ: МАУП, 1997. 60 с.
Калініченко О.В. Економіка підприємства: навчальний посібник. Київ: Кондор, 2012. 600 с.
Ситник В.П. Трансформація АПК України в ринкові умови. Київ: Інститут аграрної економіки УААН, 2002. 517 с.
Almashii Ya. I. (2015) Antykryzove finansove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom: sutnist ta mekhanizmy realizatsii [Anti-crisis financial management of an enterprise: essence and implementation mechanisms]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu Seriia : Ekonomika i menedzhment. Vyp. 12. S. 66-69. (in Ukrainian)
Boichyk I. M., Khariv P. S., Khopchpn M. I., PichaY. V.(2001) Ekonomika pidpryiemstva [Economicsof pidpryiemstva]: Kyiv: "Karavela"; Lviv: "Novyisvit 2000". 298 p, р. 124. (in Ukrainian)
Bondar N. M., Makarovska T. P. (2003) Ekonomika pidpryiemstva [Economic sofentrepreneurship]: pidruchnyk. Kyiv: MAUP, 298 p, р. 106. (in Ukrainian)
Holovatyi M. F. Upravlinski aspekty sotsialnoi roboty.[ Administrative aspects of social work]: Kyiv: 2004. 365 р. (in Ukrainian)
Horbach L. M., Kotliarov V. O. (2021) Ekonomika pidpryiemstva [nterprise Economics]: Kyiv: "Condor - 2021", 597 p, p. 40–74. (in Ukrainian)
Horbach L. M., Kaun O. B. Rynok finansovykh posluh Navchalnyi posibnyk. [Market of financial services]: Kyiv: «Kondor – 2006» 435 р, р. 30-39. (in Ukrainian)
Havkalova N. L. (2011) Upravlinnia efektyvnistiu menedzhmentu personalu [Managingthe effectivenesso fhumanresources management]: monograph. Kharkiv: KhNEU, 295 p, pp. 107-120. (in Ukrainian)
Diiesperov V. S. (2004) Ekonomika silskohospodarskoi pratsi.[Economics of agricultural labor]. Kyiv: IAE UAAN, 488 p. (in Ukrainian)
Doroshenko L. S. (1997) Upravlinnia trudovymy resursamy:[Human resources management]: navchalnyi posibnyk. Kyiv: MAUP, 60 р. (in Ukrainian)
Kalinichenko O. V. (2012) Ekonomika pidpryiemstva: [Economic sofentrepreneurship]: navchalnyi posibnyk. Kyiv: Kondor, 600 p. (in Ukrainian)
Sytnyk V. P. (2002) Transformatsiia APK Ukrainy v rynkovi umovy [Transformation of Ukraine's agro-industrial complex into market conditions]. Kyiv: Instytut ahrarnoi ekonomiky UAAN, 517 р. (in Ukrainian)

