INSTITUTIONAL PROVISION FOR THE REDUCTION OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INHERITANCE IN THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of the article is determination of the essence, components and mechanisms for improving institutional support for reducing the social and economic inequality in the current conditions of development. Methodology of research. The theoretical and practical basis of the research has formed scientific developments of researches of international organizations and leading Ukrainian and foreign authors on the problems of institutional support for reducing inequality. The following research methods are used in the process of solving the tasks: systematization and critical analysis (in determining the dialectical and methodological foundations of the institutional provision of inequality); comparative analysis and comparison (by comparing the practice of applying different institutional mechanisms for reducing inequalities in different countries and institutions); generalization and formalization (in the development of institutional mechanisms for reducing social and economic inequality in the current conditions of development). Findings. The institutional foundations of social and economic inequality are determined. The mechanisms of institutional provision of inequality are formed in three main institutes: political, social and economic. A system of mechanisms has been developed that influence the institutional provision of reducing inequalities, which are formed according to institutional directions. It is summarized that institutes, subject to the observance of certain rules, principles, norms, mechanisms and constraints, can reduce inequality and adapt effectively to internal and external factors of modern development. Originality. The author's interpretation of the definition of the institutional provision of the reduction of social and economic inequality, which should mean a set of certain institutions and mechanisms, in relation to the formation or improvement of the organizational structures of balanced development, should be understood. Practical value. The obtained results of the research are aimed at reducing social and economic inequality in modern conditions of development, in particular the developed institutional support structure can reduce inequality in the country by using effective institutional mechanisms that should be the basis of the Concept of balanced development. The obtained results may be aimed at optimizing the management of the balanced development of the national institutional system. Mechanisms of political, social and economic institutions in modern conditions of development can be proposed for analytical support to the development and implementation of the institutional structure policy in order to reduce inequality.
References
OXFAM BRIEFING PAPER. JANUARY 2017. URL: https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www. oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp-economy-for-99-percent-160117-en.pdf (дата звернення: 13.08.2018).
«Reward Work, Not Wealth». The world’s Billionaires 2017 Ranking. URL: https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/ (дата звернення: 31.08.2018).
Асемоглу Д., Джонсон С., Робинсон Д. Институты как фундаментальная причина долгосрочного экономического роста. ЭКОВЕСТ. 2006. Вып. 5, № 1. С. 4-43; Вып. 5, № 2. С. 180-247.
Пикетти Т. Капитал в XXI веке. Москва: Ad Marginem, 2015. 592 с.
Дмитренко О.В., Демченко С.А. Інституційне середовище відтворення соціальної нерівності. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна: Серія «Економічна». 2017. Випуск 93. С. 162-169.
Gimpelson V., Treisman D. Misperceiving Inequality. Economics & Politics. NBER Working Paper No. 21174. 2018. Vol. 30(1). P. 27-54.
Социальное неравенство и публичная политика / Ред. кол.: В.А. Медведев, (отв. ред.), М.К. Горшков, Ю.А. Красин. Москва: Культурная Революция, 2007. 336 с.
Parsons Т. Essays on sociological theory. N. Y. Publisher: Free Press, New Ed edition, 1964. 464 р.
Норт Д. Институты и экономический рост: историческое введение. THESIS. 1993. Вып. 2. Т. 1. С. 69-91.
Бержель Ж.Л. Общая теория права / Пер. с фр. под. общ. ред. В.И. Даниленко. Москва: Издательский дом NOTA BENE, 2000. 576 с.
Одинцова М.И. Институциональная экономика: учеб. пособие. 3-е изд. Москва: ГУ-ВШЭ, 2009. 564 с.
Кармазіна М., Шурбована О. «Інститут» та «інституція»: проблема розрізнення понять. Політичний менеджмент. 2006. № 4. С. 10-19.
Стиглиц Дж. Цена неравенства. Чем расслоение общества грозит нашему будущему; пер. с англ. Москва: Эксмо, 2015. 512 с.
Calderón C., Chong A. Labor market institutions and income inequality: an empirical exploration. Public Choice. 2009. Vol. 138. Р. 65-81.
Soskice D., Iversen T. Inequality and Redistribution: A Unified Approach to the Role of Economic and Political Institutions. Revue еconomique. 2011. Vol. 62. № 4. Р. 629-650.
Cervellati M., Fortunato P., Sunde U. Hobbes to Rousseau: Inequality, Institutions and Development. The Economic Journal. 2008. Vol. 118. №. 531 (Aug.). Р. 1354-1384.
Gradstein M. Institutional Traps and Economic Growth. International Economic Review. 2008. Vol. 49. №. 3 (August). Р. 1043-1066.
Holcombe R.G., Boudreaux Ch.J. Market institutions and income inequality. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2016. February. Р. 1-19.
The Inclusive Development Index 2018. URL: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-inclusive- development-index-2018 (дата звернення: 23.08.2018).
Кругман П. Кредо либерала. Москва: Европа, 2009. 368 с.
The World Top Incomes Database. URL: http://www.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/en/research/the- world-top-incomes-database (дата звернення: 25.08.2018).
Helpman E., Itskhoki O., Redding S. Inequality and Unemployment in a Global Economy. Econometrica. 2010. Vol. 78. № 4. Р. 1239-1283.
Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. The Rise and Decline of General Laws of Capitalism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2015. Vol. 29. № 1 (Winter). Р. 3-28
OXFAM BRIEFING PAPER (2017), available at: https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www. oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp-economy-for-99-percent-160117-en.pdf (access date August 13, 2018).
«Reward Work, Not Wealth» (2017), The world’s Billionaires 2017 Ranking, available at: https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/ (access date August 31, 2018).
Asemoglu, D., Dzhonson, S. and Robinson, D. (2006), “Institutes as fundamental reason of the long- term economy growing”, EKOVEST, Iss. 5, no. 1, pp. 4-43; Iss. 5, no. 2, pp. 180-247.
Piketti, T. (2015), Kapital v XXI veke [Capital in the Twenty-First Century], Ad Marginem, Moscow, Russia, 592 р.
Dmytrenko, O.V. and Demchenko, S.A. (2017), “The institutional environment for the reproduction of social inequality”, Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina: Seriia «Ekonomichna», Issue 93, рр. 162-169.
Gimpelson, V. and Treisman, D. (2018), “Misperceiving Inequality”, Economics & Politics. NBER Working Paper No. 21174, Vol. 30(1), pр. 27-54.
Medvedev, V.A., Gorshkov, M.K. and Krasin, Yu.A. (2007), Sotsialnoe neravenstvo I publichnaia politika [Social inequality and public policy], Kulturnaia revoliutsiia, Moscow, Russia, 336 р.
Parsons, Т. (1964), Essays on sociological theory, Free Press, New Ed edition, New York, USA, 464 p.
Nort, D. (1993), “Institutions and economic growth: a historic introduction”, THESIS, Іss. 2, Vol. 1, рр. 69-91.
Berzhel, Zh.L. (2000), Obshchaia teoriia prava [General theory of law], Translated by V.I. Danilenko, Izdatelskiy dom NOTA BENE, Moscow, Russia, 576 р.
Odintsova, M.I. (2009), Institutsionalnaia ekonomika [Institutional Economics], tutorial, 3rd edition, GU-VShE, Moscow, Russia, 564 р.
Karmazina, M. and Shurbovana, O. (2006), “"Institute" and "inostitution": the problem of understanding”, Politychnyi menedzhment, no. 4, рp.10-19.
Stiglits, Dzh. (2015), Tsena neravenstva. Chem rassloenie obshchestva grozit nashemu budushchemu [The Price of Inequality. How today’s divided society endangers our future], Eksmo, Moscow, Russia, 512 р.
Calderоn, C. and Chong, A. (2009), “Labor market institutions and income inequality: an empirical exploration”, Public Choice, Vol. 138, pp. 65-81.
Soskice, D. and Iversen, T. (2011), “Inequality and Redistribution: A Unified Approach to the Role of Economic and Political Institutions”, Revue еconomique, Vol. 62, no. 4, рр. 629-650.
Cervellati, M., Fortunato, P. and Sunde, U. (2008), “Hobbes to Rousseau: Inequality, Institutions and Development”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 118, no. 531 (Aug.), pp. 1354-1384.
Gradstein, M. (2008), “Institutional Traps and Economic Growth”, International Economic Review, Vol. 49, no. 3 (August), pp. 1043-1066.
Holcombe, R.G. and Boudreaux, Ch.J. (2016), “Market institutions and income inequality”, Journal of Institutional Economics, February, pp. 1-19.
The Inclusive Development Index (2018), available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the- inclusive-development-index-2018 (access date August 23, 2018).
Kruhman, P. (2009), Kredo liberala [Liberal credo], Evropa, Moscow, Russia, 368 р.
The World Top Incomes Database (2018), available at: http://www.parisschoolofeconomics. eu/en/research/the-world-top-incomes-database (access date August 25, 2018).
Helpman, E., Itskhoki, O. and Redding, S. (2010), “Inequality and Unemployment in a Global Economy”, Econometrica, Vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1239-1283.
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A. (2015), “The Rise and Decline of General Laws of Capitalism”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 29, no. 1 (Winter), pp. 3-28.
