DESIGNING A FRAMEWORK OF INDICATORS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF UNREGISTERED PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS UNDER CONDITIONS OF DECLARATIVE FISCAL NEUTRALITY

Keywords: fiscal neutrality, permanent establishment, BEPS, controlled foreign companies, tax avoidance, economic substance, tax sovereignty, aggressive tax structuring, international taxation, sustainable development, tax policy

Abstract

The article addresses the development of an indicator-based framework for identifying unregistered permanent establishments of non-residents in Ukraine under the conditions of declarative fiscal neutrality. The study highlights the declarative compliance of Ukraine’s tax system with the principle of fiscal neutrality, as stipulated in the Tax Code of Ukraine, ensuring horizontal and vertical equity. However, the research emphasizes the limitations of fiscal neutrality in counteracting BEPS (base erosion and profit shifting) practices and maintaining the sovereignty of national tax revenues. The study critically examines the hypothesis that adherence to fiscal neutrality under the capital export neutrality concept can eliminate tax-driven decisions and ensure competitive neutrality in international investment. Statistical analysis represented in author`s previous research disproves this hypothesis, demonstrating that fiscal neutrality alone cannot address the challenges posed by global economic processes, tax competition, and BEPS-related practices. These challenges often include strategies employed by non-residents to avoid recognition of permanent establishment status in Ukraine, thereby minimizing tax liabilities. The author develops a system of risk indicators based on data accessible through the implementation of controlled foreign company rules in Ukraine. This system focuses on identifying potential unregistered permanent establishments by analyzing factors such as management location, economic substance, and relationships between non-resident companies and Ukrainian residents. Key risk factors include significant income generation by controlled foreign companies with minimal personnel or assets, economic activities conducted in Ukraine, and governance structures indicative of effective control being exercised within the country. The findings stress the importance of using a comprehensive approach that integrates multiple BEPS counteraction tools rather than relying on isolated measures. The developed indicator system demonstrates the potential to enhance tax authorities’ capabilities in identifying tax evasion strategies, thereby protecting the sovereignty of Ukraine’s tax revenues and ensuring equitable conditions for all economic actors. The proposed system contributes to the broader discourse on the modernization of tax policies in response to global economic and regulatory dynamics, emphasizing the strategic importance of safeguarding national fiscal interests in an increasingly interconnected world.

References

Avi-Yonah R. S. Globalization, Tax Competition and the Fiscal Crisis of the Welfare State. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2000. С. 46–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.208748.

Avi-Yonah R.S., Lahav Y. The Effective Tax Rate of the Largest US and EU Multinationals. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2011. P. 375–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1949226.

Bird R., Davis-Nozemack K. Tax Avoidance as a Sustainability Problem. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016. Т. 151. № 4. P. 1009–1025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3162-2

Clausing K.A. The Effect of Profit Shifting on the Corporate Tax Base in the United States and Beyond. National Tax Journal. 2016. Т. 69. № 4. P. 905–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2016.4.09

Coates W.H. League of Nations Report on Double Taxation Submitted to the Financial Committee by Professors Bruins, Einaudi, Seligman, and Sir Josiah Stamp. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1924. Т. 87. № 1. P. 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2341293

Corporate Tax Rates Around the World, 2022. Tax Foundation. URL: https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/global/corporate-tax-rates-by-country-2022 (дата звернення: 01.12.2024).

Lapidoth A. Principles of International Double Taxation Relief. By D.R. Davies [Sweet and Maxwell. 1985, 321 + xix pp.]. Israel Law Review. 1988. Т. 22, № 4. P. 524–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s002122370000947x

Desai M.A., Hines J.R. Evaluating International Tax Reform. National Tax Journal. 2003. Т. 56, № 3. P. 463–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.3.03

Desai M. A., Hines J. R. Old Rules and New Realities: Corporate Tax Policy in a Global Setting. National Tax Journal. 2004. Т. 57, № 4. P. 937–960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.4.09

Draft Double Taxation Convention on Income and Capital. OECD, 1963. P. 7–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073241-en

Feldstein M., Hartman D. The Optimal Taxation of Foreign Source Investment Income. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1979. Т. 93, № 4. P. 613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884472

Harmful Tax Competition. OECD, 1998. P. 7–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264162945-en

The Mirrlees Review: Conclusions and Recommendations for Reform / Mirrlees J. at el. Fiscal Studies. 2011. Т. 32, № 3. P. 331–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2011.00140.x

Носенко Д.В. Оцінка шкідливих впливів BEPS щодо штучного уникнення визнання статусу постійного представництва в контексті фіскального нейтралітету. Міжнародний науковий журнал «Інтернаука». Серія: «Економічні науки». 2024 №10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2024-10-10368

Податковий кодекс України : Кодекс України від 02.12.2010 № 2755-VI : станом на 11 груд. 2024 р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17#Text

Richman (Musgrave), P.B. Taxation of foreign investment income: An economic analysis. Johns Hopkins Press, 1963. P. 5–11.

Rixen T. From double tax avoidance to tax competition: Explaining the institutional trajectory of international tax governance. Review of International Political Economy. 2011. Т. 18, № 2. P. 197–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2010.481921

Avi-Yonah R. S. (2000)Globalization, Tax Competition and the Fiscal Crisis of the Welfare State. SSRN Electronic Journal. pp. 46–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.208748

Avi-Yonah R. S., Lahav Y. (2011) The Effective Tax Rate of the Largest US and EU Multinationals. SSRN Electronic Journal. pp. 375–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1949226

Bird R., Davis-Nozemack K. (2016) Tax Avoidance as a Sustainability Problem. Journal of Business Ethics. vol. 151, no. 4. pp. 1009–1025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3162-2

Clausing K. A. (2016) The Effect of Profit Shifting on the Corporate Tax Base in the United States and Beyond. National Tax Journal. vol. 69, no. 4. pp. 905–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2016.4.09

Coates W. H. (1924) League of Nations Report on Double Taxation Submitted to the Financial Committee by Professors Bruins, Einaudi, Seligman, and Sir Josiah Stamp. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. vol. 87, no. 1. p. 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2341293

Corporate Tax Rates Around the World. (2022). Tax Foundation. URL: https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/global/corporate-tax-rates-by-country-2022

Lapidoth A. (1988) Principles of International Double Taxation Relief. By D.R. Davies [Sweet and Maxwell. 1985, 321 + xix pp.]. Israel Law Review. vol. 22, no. 4. pp. 524–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s002122370000947x

Desai M. A., Hines J. R. (2003) Evaluating International Tax Reform. National Tax Journal. vol. 56, no. 3. pp. 463–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.3.03

Desai M. A., Hines J. R. (2004) Old Rules and New Realities: Corporate Tax Policy in a Global Setting. National Tax Journal. vol. 57, no. 4. pp. 937–960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.4.09

Draft Double Taxation Convention on Income and Capital. OECD. (1963). Pp. 7–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073241-en

Feldstein M., Hartman D. (1979)The Optimal Taxation of Foreign Source Investment Income. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. vol. 93, no. 4. p. 613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884472

Harmful Tax Competition. (1998) OECD. Pp. 7–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264162945-en.

The Mirrlees Review: Conclusions and Recommendations for Reform / Mirrlees J. et al. (2011) Fiscal Studies. vol. 32, no. 3. pp. 331–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2011.00140.x

Nosenko D. (2024) Assessment of the harmful effects of BEPS due to the artificial avoidance of permanent establishment status in the context of fiscal neutrality. International scientific journal "Internauka". Series: "Economic Sciences". no. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2024-10-10368

Tax Code of Ukraine: Code of Ukraine of 02.12.2010 no. 2755-VI : as of 11 December 2024. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17#Text

Richman (Musgrave), P. B. (1963) Taxation of foreign investment income: An economic analysis. Johns Hopkins Press. P. 5–11.

Rixen T. (2011) From double tax avoidance to tax competition: Explaining the institutional trajectory of international tax governance. Review of International Political Economy. vol. 18, no. 2. pp. 197–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2010.481921

Article views: 5
PDF Downloads: 3
Published
2025-01-03
How to Cite
Nosenko, D. (2025). DESIGNING A FRAMEWORK OF INDICATORS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF UNREGISTERED PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS UNDER CONDITIONS OF DECLARATIVE FISCAL NEUTRALITY. Sustainable Development of Economy, (4(51), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2024-51-30