“STRUCTURE” AS A SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CATEGORY AND ITS CHARACTERISTIС FEATURES

  • Diana Shelenko Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
Keywords: agricultural structure, relations of ownership, structure, organizational and legal forms, economic category, agriculture

Abstract

Purpose. The main purpose of the research carried out in this article was the application of systematicity to the problems of the formation in the agricultural sector. Methodology of research. In the process of research, general scientific and special methodological approaches and methods were used, in particular: the systematic approach – to the consideration of the problem; monographic method – when studying literary sources of the problem under study; methods of analysis and synthesis – when considering different points of view in the disclosure of the essence of the concept "structure" and its characteristic features, the abstract and logical method – when drawing conclusions from the results of the study. Findings. The essence of the concept “structure” is revealed, systemic analysis and comparison of interpretations of this concept by different scientists are carried out. Systemic understanding of the concept “structure“ in the article has allowed grouping of different points of view in the disclosure of this interpretation and to characterize their features. The characteristics of the structure has been studied: a special form of economic activity; autonomy in decision making; availability of freedom of choice, directions and methods of activity; constant presence of risk factors. It has been proved that the development of the structures plays a major role in the formation of the state's agrarian policy. The existence of different structures can be considered as a strategic direction for the creation of civilized agriculture in the countryside. Originality. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is to justify the fact that the optimal number of structures in the rural areas will create the additional jobs and the possibility of earning money for peasants, protection and rational land use, that is, stable economic growth, and further and progressive development of the region. Practical value. The results of the research can be used to create various organizational and legal forms of agricultural enterprises.

References

Русская мысль. – М. : 1894. Т. 5. С. 229–230. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.knigafund.ru/books/25400/read#page229.

Большой французско-русский и русско-французский словарь [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу : http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/fre_rus/123798/%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4.

Concise Oxford Russian Dictionary / Ред. М. Уилер, Б. Унбегаун, П. Фалла. – М. : “Весь Мир”, “Инфра-М”, 2005. – С. 437.

Даль В. И. Толковый словарь живого великорусского языка. В 4-х т. / В. И. Даль. – М. : Рус. язык, 1989-1991. – 2800 с.

Словник української мови. В 11 т. – Т. 10. – 1979 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://sum.in.ua/s/uklad.

Новый толково-словообразовательный словарь русского языка / под. ред. Т. Ф. Ефремова [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://poiskslov.com/word/%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4/

Советский энциклопедический словарь. – М. : Советская энциклопедия. – 1984. – 1600 с.

Многоукладная аграрная экономика и российская деревня / под ред. Е. С. Строева. – М. : Колос, 2001. – 539 с.

Семѐнов Ю.И. Категория “общественно-экономический уклад” и еѐ значение для философской и исторической наук / Ю.И. Семѐнов // Философские науки. – 1964. – № 3. – С. 25-33.

Большая Советская энциклопедия. Т. 26. – М. : Советская энциклопедия. – 1977. – 622 с.

Романов A. E. Концепция развития многоукладной экономики аграрного сектора России / A. E. Романов, А. Ф. Серков, В. П. Арашуков. – М. : ВНИИСХ. – 1993. – 47 с.

Баланюк Г. В. Сутність понять “уклад” та “різноукладність” / Г. В. Баланюк // Інноваційна економіка. – 2012. – № 6 [32]. – C. 317-320.

Вечканов Г.С. Краткая экономическая энциклопедия: [энциклопедия] / Г. С. Вечканов, Г.Р. Вечканова, В. Т. Пуляев. – СПб : Петрополис, 1998. – 508 с.

Вікіпедія [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Экономический_уклад.

Таксер А. Проблемы общественно-экономической формации (под знаменем марксизма) / А. Таксер. – М. – 1932. – T 1. – С. 190-191.

Фролова О. А. Развитие форм хозяйствования в многоукладной аграрной экономике: теория, методология, практика: дис. на соискание ученой степени доктора экономических наук, спец. 08.00.05. / О. А. Фролова. – Княгинино, 2011. – 310 с.

Брус В. Х. Розвиток різноукладності у сільському господарстві регіону: дис. на здобуття ступеня канд. екон. наук: 08.07.02 / В. Х Брус. – К. – 2002. – 162 с.

Russkaya mysl [Russian thought] (1894), Vol. 5, pp. 229–230, Moscow, Russia, available at: http://www.knigafund.ru/books/25400/read#page229 (access date November 02, 2017).

“Great French-Russian and Russian-French dictionary”, available at: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/fre_rus/123798/%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4. (access date February 02, 2018).

Uyler, M., Unbehaun, B., and Falla, P. (2005), Concise Oxford Russian Dictionary, “All World”, “Infra-M”, Moscow, Russia.

Dal, V.I. (1989-1991). Tolkovyy slovar, zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language], Russkiy yazyk, Moscow, Russia, 2800 p.

Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language] (1979), Vol. 10, available at: http://sum.in.ua/s/uklad. (access date January 02, 2018).

Efremov, T.F. “A new explanatory dictionary of the Russian language”, available at: http://poiskslov.com/word/%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4/ (access date January 02, 2018).

Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary] (1984), Soviet Encyclopedia, Moscow, Russia.

Stroev, E.S. (2001), Mnogoukladnaya agrarnaya ekonomika i rossiyskaya derevnya [Multistructural Agrarian Economics and the Russian Village], Kolos, Moscow, Russia.

Semyonov, Yu.I. (1964), “Category “socio and economic structure” and its significance for philosophical and historical sciences”, Filosofskie nauki. Philosophical sciences, no. 13, pp. 25-33.

Bolshaya Sovetskaya entsiklopediya [The Great Soviet Encyclopedia] (1977), (Vol. 26), Soviet Encyclopedia, Moscow, Russia.

Romanov, A.E., Serkov, A.F., and Arashukov, V.P. (1993). Kontseptsiya razvitiya mnogoukladnoy ekonomiki agrarnogo sektora Rossii [The Concept of Development of the Multi-Structural Economy of the Agricultural Sector of Russia], VNIISKh, Moscow, Russia, 47 p.

Balaniuk, H.V. (2012), “The essence of the concepts of “structure” and “heterogeneity”, Innovatsiina ekonomika, no. 6 [32], pp. 317-320.

Vechkanov, G.S., Vechkanova, G.R., and Pulyaev, V.T. (1998), Kratkaya ekonomicheskaya entsiklopediya [Brief Economic Encyclopedia], Petropolis, St. Petersburg, Russia, 508 p.

Wikipediia, available at: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Экономический_уклад (access date November 02, 2017).

Takser, A. (1932), Problemy obshhestvenno-ekonomicheskoy formatsii (pod znamenem marksizma) [Problems of the socio and economic formation (under the banner of Marxism)], Vol. 1, pp. 190- 191, Moscow, Russia.

Frolova, O.A. (2011), “Development of forms of management in a heterogeneity agrarian economy: theory, methodology, practice”, Thesis abstract of Cand. Sc. (Econ.), 08.00.05, Knyaginino, Russia, 310 p.

Brus, V.Kh. (2002), “Development of Heterogeneity Agriculture of the Region”, Thesis abstract of Cand. Sc. (Econ.), 08.07.02, Kyiv, Ukraine, 162 p.

Article views: 3
PDF Downloads: 2
Published
2018-02-20
How to Cite
Shelenko, D. (2018). “STRUCTURE” AS A SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CATEGORY AND ITS CHARACTERISTIС FEATURES. Sustainable Development of Economy, (1(38), 80-85. Retrieved from https://economdevelopment.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/191
Section
ECONOMY AND MANAGEMENT OF ENTERPRISES