TRANSFORMATION OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND ECONOMIC MODEL OF MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE AS A BASE OF TERRITORIAL BRANDING

  • Yuliia Maistrenko Kyiv University for Market Relations
Keywords: organizational and economic model, management, field of the culture, establishments of culture, united territorial community, decentralization, territorial branding; tourism

Abstract

Purpose. Development of theoretical, methodological provisions and practical recommendations on transformation of the organizational and economic model of management in the field of culture in the context of territorial progress. Methodology of research. Methodological base of the research are a systematic approach to researching of economic phenomena and researches of leading economists on management of the field of culture. The features and trends of development of the field of culture and status of establishments of culture are determined by the help of methods of comparative analysis and economic diagnostic. Economic and mathematical modeling is used in the process of forecasting of scope of employees in the field of culture according to scope of citizens. The method of expert assessments is used in the process of determining of strong and weak sides, opportunities and treatments to development of the field of culture. System-structural and functional approaches and plural of methods which are used on the theoretical and empirical levels of scientific cognition are used in the process of development of organizational and economic model of management in the field of culture. Findings. Theoretical approaches to the management of the field of culture are generalized. Legal base and model of financial providing of local budgets are analyzed to estimate of financial status of establishments of culture in UTC. There is proposed to establish Union Cultural and Leisure Center on the base of village club, library and museum, to make UCLC self-sufficient in the future. Main orders of development of the alternative financial sources are defined. The activity on forming of tourist and recreational cluster in conditions of UTC is grounded. It is forecasted that this cluster will lead to creation and promotion of brands of each territories taking into account its unique historical and cultural inheritance. The density of correlation connection between a number of citizens of UTC and a number of employees in the field of culture in the circumstances of creation of UCLC is determined by the help of construction of the economic-mathematical model. The SWOT- analysis is carried-out. Problems are identified and orders of development of the field of culture in circumstances of UTC on the base of SWOT – analysis. Originality. The systematic approach to construction of effective organizational and economic model of management in the field of culture is used. The features of methods and means as subjects of state vertical government, and also internal governmental subsystems which are based on the involving of cluster approach, of indicators of activities of citizens and of progress of touristic field are taken into account in the process of using of systematic approach to construction of effective organizational and economic model of management in the field of culture. It is necessary to stress that such way has never been used before. Practical value. Recommendations on transformation of organizational and economic model of management in the field of culture in circumstances of UTC are carried out. These recommendations will permit to increase effectiveness of activities of establishments in the field of culture and touristic attractiveness of territories.

References

Булавка О.Г. Місцеві бюджети – основа розвитку сільських територіальних громад. Економіка АПК. 2014. № 7. С. 127-132.

Драган О.І. Сучасний стан соціально-культурної сфери України. Інтелект ХХІ. 2016. № 2. С. 68-78.

Кальна-Дубінюк Т.П. Розвиток ринку послуг підприємств соціально-культурної сфери в Україні. Вісник Академії праці і соціальних відносин. 2014. № 1. С. 46-51.

Куйбіда В.С., Возний С.О. Сутність та методи взаємовідносин органів місцевого самоврядування з органами державної виконавчої влади щодо формування дієздатності територіальних громад. Державне будівництво: електрон. наук. фах. вид. 2016. № 1. URL: http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/db/2016-1/doc/2/01.pdf (дата звернення: 05.05.2018).

Малік М.Й. та ін. Стратегічні напрями сталого розвитку сільських територій на період до 2020 року / за ред. Ю.О. Лупенка, О.Г. Булавки. Київ, 2013. 74 с.

Мартинишин Я.М. Системний підхід в управлінні корпораціями у сфері культури. Економіка і менеджмент культури. 2015. № 1. С. 29-39.

Соскін О.І. Формування інституціональної основи економічної моделі України. Галицький економічний вісник. 2010. № 2(27). С. 53-60.

Girard A. Cultural Development: Experiences and Policies. Paris: UNESCO, 1983. 189 p.

Diamond L. Why Dectntralize Power in a Democracy? Conference on Fiscal and Administrative Decentralization. 2004. URL: https://web.stanford.edu/~ldiamond/iraq.html (дата звернення: 05.05.2018).

Ezcurra R., Rodrigue-Pose А. Decentralization of social protection expenditure and economic growth in the OECD. The Journal of Federalism volume. 2011. № 41(1). Pр. 146-157.

Robbins S.P., DeCenzo D.A. Podstawy zarządzania. Nauka administracii. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. 2002. Рр. 235-236.

Гройсман В.Б. Процеси централізації та децентралізації в сучасному державному управлінні. Державне управління та місцеве самоврядування. 2015. № 2(25). С. 26-37.

Європейська Хартія місцевого самоврядування: за станом на 16 листопада 2009 р. / Верховна рада України. URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_036 (дата звернення: 05.05.2018).

Міністерство регіонального розвитку, будівництва та житлово-комунального господарства України: веб-сайт. URL: http://www.minregion.gov.ua/ (дата звернення: 05.05.2018).

Костирко І.Г., Корчинська О.О. Кластерний підхід у розвитку сільського зеленого туризму. Інноваційна економіка. 2015. № 4. С. 159-163.

Bulavka, O.H. (2014), “Local budgets are the basis for the development of rural communities”, Ekonomika APK, no. 7, pp. 127-132.

Drahan, O.I. (2016), “The modern state of the socio-cultural sphere of Ukraine”, Intelekt XXI, no. 2, pp. 68-78.

Kalna-Dubiniuk, T.P. (2014), “Development of the market of services of enterprises of social-cultural sphere in Ukraine”, Visnyk Akademii pratsi i sotsialnykh vidnosyn, no. 1, pp. 46-51.

Kuibida, V.S. and Voznyi, S.O. (2016), “Essence and methods of relations of local self- government bodies with state executive authorities regarding the formation of the capacity of territorial communities”, Derzhavne budivnytstvo: elektron. nauk. fakh. vyd., no. 1, available at: http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/db/2016-1/doc/2/01.pdf (access date May 05, 2018).

Malik, M.Y. et al. (2013), Stratehichni napriamy staloho rozvytku silskykh terytorii na period do 2020 roku [Strategic directions of sustainable development of rural territories for the period till 2020], Kyiv, Ukraine, 74 p.

Martynyshyn, Ya.M. (2015), “System approach in the management of corporations in the field of culture”, Ekonomika i menedzhment kultury, no. 1, pp. 29-39.

Soskin, O.I. (2010), “Formation of the institutional basis of the economic model of Ukraine”, Halytskyi ekonomichnyi visnyk, no. 2(27), pp. 53-60.

Girard, A. (1983), Cultural Development: Experiences and Policies. Paris: UNESCO, 189 p.

Diamond, L. (2004), Why Dectntralize Power in a Democracy?, Banghdad: Iraq, available at: https://web.stanford.edu/~ldiamond/iraq.html (access date May 05, 2018).

Ezcurra, R. and Rodrigue-Pose, A. (2011), “Decentralization of social protection expenditure and economic growth in the OECD”, The Journal of Federalism volume, no. 41 (1), pp. 146-157.

Robbins, S.P. and Decenzo, D.A. (2002), “Podstawy zarządzania”, Nauka administracii, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa, Poland, pp. 235-236.

Hroisman, V.B. (2015), “Processes of centralization and decentralization in modern state management”, Derzhavne upravlinnia ta mistseve samovriaduvannia, no. 2 (25), pp. 26-37.

Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy (2009), Yevropeiska Khartiia mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [European Charter of Local Self-Government], available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_036 (access date May 05, 2018).

Ministerstvo rehionalnoho rozvytku, budivnytstva ta zhytlovo-komunalnoho hospodarstva Ukrainy [Ministry of Regional Development, Construction and Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine], available at: http://www.minregion.gov.ua/ (access date May 05, 2018).

Kostyrko, I.H. and Korchynska, O.O (2015), “Cluster approach in the development of rural green tourism”, Innovatsiina ekonomika, no. 4, pp. 159-163.

Article views: 4
PDF Downloads: 1
Published
2018-05-28
How to Cite
Maistrenko, Y. (2018). TRANSFORMATION OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND ECONOMIC MODEL OF MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE AS A BASE OF TERRITORIAL BRANDING. Sustainable Development of Economy, (2(39), 72-79. Retrieved from https://economdevelopment.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/164
Section
ECONOMY AND MANAGEMENT OF ENTERPRISES